Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MAYUR MADHAV KANSEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the writ petition should be treated as a representation and the petitioner must approach the Grievance Committee for consideration of his grievance.

Summary

Mayur Madhav Kanse filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an approval order issued by the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner sought correction of the approval order and relief from the State. The Court, referencing its earlier decisions in Writ Petition Nos. 7357 of 2023 and 1457 of 2026, treated the petition as a representation rather than a direct writ remedy. It directed the petitioner to approach the Grievance Committee constituted under the Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 for consideration of his case. The Court also ordered that the pending correction application be decided on its merits within eight weeks of receipt of the order. Consequently, the petition was disposed with liberty granted to the petitioner to seek relief through the Grievance Committee.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition seeking correction of an approval order can be treated as a representation before a grievance committee.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to a directive to approach the Grievance Committee for relief.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • grievance committee
  • representation
  • correction of approval order
  • procedural relief

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39007-DB
                                                    1                         56.doc



                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                     56 WRIT PETITION NO. 10689 OF 2026
                           MAYUR MADHAV KANSE
                                   VERSUS
      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND
                                  OTHERS
                                             …
                  Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Tukaram Maruti Venjane
                        AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. N.D. Batule
                                               …
                                           CORAM        : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                          ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                             DATE       : 27.08.2026

             PER COURT :
             .       The Writ Petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the Petitioner
             to approach the Grievance Committee constituted under the Government
             Resolution dated 27.03.2024.

             2.      This Writ Petition be treated as a representation. The Grievance
             Committee shall consider the case of the Petitioner in the light of
             decisions of this Court in Writ Petition No. 7357 of 2023 and 1457 of
             2026 within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of appearance of
             the Petitioner.

             3.      So far as the correction in the approval order of the petitioner is
             concerned, the representation of the petitioner dated 11.03.2026 is
             pending before respondent No.4. The same shall be decided within a
             period of eight (08) weeks, on its own merits, from the date of receipt of
             copy of this order.


             ( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. )                  ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. )
   vsj..


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.