Bombay High Court
SHANKAR ACHINTYA LAHIRIversusSHORMISTHA CHAKRABORTY AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Shankar Achintya Lahiri filed a writ petition (No. 10725 of 2023) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of Vaishali Anil TIKAM and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent was represented by Ms. Priyesha Patel, instructed by Nitesh Bhutekar. The matter was listed for dismissal, and the court noted the petitioner’s failure to prosecute the petition. The court observed that without active prosecution, the petition could not proceed. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- non‑prosecution
- civil appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
9-WP-10725-2023 (C).doc
Tikam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10725 OF 2023
Shankar Achintya Lahiri ...Petitioner/s
Versus
VAISHALI
ANIL Shormistha Chakraborty and anr. ...Respondent/s
TIKAM
_________________________________________________________________
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI
ANIL TIKAM
Date:
None for Petitioner.
2026.08.25
10:59:11 +0530 Ms. Priyesha Patel i/by Nitesh Bhutekar Advocate for Respondent.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2026.
P.C. :
1. None present for Petitioner.
2. Heard learned counsel for Respondents.
3. Matter is kept under the caption ‘for Dismissal’.
4. Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…