Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DR SADASHIV NARAYAN BOLBHATversusTHE JOINT DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the respondent must decide the pension proposal within four weeks of the order.

Summary

Dr. Sadashiv Narayan Bolbhat filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Joint Director of Higher Education to decide a pension proposal forwarded by another respondent through a letter dated 18 March 2025. The petitioner argued that the proposal had remained pending without a decision. The respondents contended that no specific time limit was prescribed for such decisions. The Court examined whether the administrative authority was bound to decide the proposal within a reasonable period. It directed the respondent to decide the proposal expeditiously, specifying a period of four weeks from the date the order is presented. The petition was disposed of without any costs.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Joint Director of Higher Education is obligated to decide the pension proposal within a reasonable time.

Subjects

  • pension
  • higher education
  • writ petition
  • administrative law
  • expeditious decision

Judgment

        Digitally
        signed by
        PRAJAKTA
PRAJAKTA SAGAR
                                                                                        402-WP 10727-26.DOC
SAGAR    VARTAK
VARTAK   Date:
        2026.09.03
        09:56:22
        +0530




   Prajakta Vartak
                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        WRIT PETITION NO. 10727 OF 2026

                    Dr. Sadashiv Narayan Bolbhat                            ...Petitioner
                           Versus
                    The Joint Director of Higher Education & Ors.           ...Respondents
                                                      _________

                    Mr. Sugandh Deshmukh with Mr. Irvin D’Souza for Petitioner.
                    Mr. Aditya Deolekar, AGP for State.
                                                      _________

                                                       CORAM:          G. S. KULKARNI &
                                                                       Dr. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
                                                       DATE:           01 SEPTEMBER 2026.

                    P.C.

                    1.     The only prayer as made in the petition is that respondent no.1 be directed

                    to decide the pension proposal forwarded by respondent no.4 vide letter No.

                    1557 of 2024-2025 dated 18 March 2025.

                    2.     We direct that respondent no.1 shall decide the said proposal as

                    expeditiously as possible and, in any event, within a period of four weeks from the

                    date on which a copy of this order is presented. All contentions of the parties in

                    that regard are expressly kept open.

                    3.     Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs.




                    (Dr. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)                                 (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)




                                                       Page 1 of 1
                                                   01 September 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.