Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH ABDUL LAEEQUE SK ABDUL LATEEF AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The State must decide the petitioners’ representation on its merits within twelve weeks of receipt of the Court’s order.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra regarding a representation dated 15‑07‑2026, styled as a legal notice. The Court examined whether the State was obligated to consider the representation on its merits within a reasonable time. Relying on the Apex Court’s decision in Chaya & others v. State of Maharashtra (SLP (C) No.14517‑14539 of 2025), the Court held that the State must decide the matter on its merits. Accordingly, the Court directed Respondent No. 2 to render a decision within twelve weeks of receipt of the order. The petition was disposed of on this basis.

Issues considered

  • What duty, if any, does the State have to decide a representation styled as a legal notice on its merits within a reasonable time?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • representation
  • legal notice
  • administrative law
  • time‑bound decision

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39359-DB
                                                   (1)                     84wp10731.26




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   84 WRIT PETITION NO. 10731 OF 2026
                            Shaikh Abdul Laeeque Sk Abdul Lateef And Others
                                                                        ….Petitioners
                                               VERSUS

                            The State Of Maharashtra Thr Secretary And Others
                                                                       …..Respondents


                Mr. Syed Azizoddin R., Advocate for the Petitioners
                Mr. M. K. Goyanka, AGP for the respondent/State

                                         CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI &
                                                 ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.
                                           DATE : 24th AUGUST, 2026


                PER COURT :

                1.               The Petition is disposed of by directing the Respondent

                No. 2 to take decision on the representation of the Petitioners dated

                15-07-2026 styled as ‘Legal Notice’, on its own merits within a period

                of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order by

                taking into consideration the decision of the Apex Court in Civil

                Appeal Nos… of 2026 (SLP (C) No.14517-14539 of 2025) [Chaya

                and others Etc. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another Etc. ].




                [ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. ]                [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]


                VishalK/84wp10731.26



                                                                                   1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.