Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NILESH MOHAN SHINDE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the original criminal proceedings were disposed of by compromise.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. The counsel for the contesting respondent informed the court that the original criminal proceedings had been settled by a compromise, and produced the compromise order dated 18-03-2026. The court took note of this order and observed that, with the settlement, no operative relief remained to be granted. Consequently, the petition was held to be infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as there was nothing left to adjudicate.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of a compromise order on the continuance of a criminal writ petition?

Subjects

  • compromise
  • criminal writ petition
  • dismissal
  • infructuous
  • settlement

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:40185
                                                                      972-WP-1074-2022.odt



                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                       972 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1074 OF 2022

                                Nilesh Mohan Shinde And Others
                                            VERSUS
                              The State Of Maharashtra And Another

          Mr. R. R. Karpe, Advocate for the Petitioner
          Mrs. P. J. Bhrad, APP for Respondents
          Mr. G. R. Syed, Advocate for Respondent No. 2

                                                            CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J
                                                            DATE  :SEPTEMBER 03, 2026

          P. C. :

          1.           Learned Counsel for contesting Respondent, on instructions,

          makes statement that the original proceedings are disposed of as

          compromise has been arrived at between the parties. He placed on record

          copy of order dated 18.03.2026. The said order is taken on record and

          marked as ‘X’ for identification.


          2.           In view of above, as nothing survives in the Petition, Petition

          stands dismissed as infructuous.


                                                               (R. M. JOSHI, J.)
          Malani




                                              Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.