Bombay High Court
NILESH MOHAN SHINDE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the original criminal proceedings were disposed of by compromise.
Summary
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. The counsel for the contesting respondent informed the court that the original criminal proceedings had been settled by a compromise, and produced the compromise order dated 18-03-2026. The court took note of this order and observed that, with the settlement, no operative relief remained to be granted. Consequently, the petition was held to be infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as there was nothing left to adjudicate.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of a compromise order on the continuance of a criminal writ petition?
Subjects
- compromise
- criminal writ petition
- dismissal
- infructuous
- settlement
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:40185
972-WP-1074-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
972 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1074 OF 2022
Nilesh Mohan Shinde And Others
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
Mr. R. R. Karpe, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mrs. P. J. Bhrad, APP for Respondents
Mr. G. R. Syed, Advocate for Respondent No. 2
CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE :SEPTEMBER 03, 2026
P. C. :
1. Learned Counsel for contesting Respondent, on instructions,
makes statement that the original proceedings are disposed of as
compromise has been arrived at between the parties. He placed on record
copy of order dated 18.03.2026. The said order is taken on record and
marked as ‘X’ for identification.
2. In view of above, as nothing survives in the Petition, Petition
stands dismissed as infructuous.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
Malani
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…