Bombay High Court
AKASH DILIP RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Education Officer must decide the petitioner's proposal on its merits within six weeks of receipt of the Court's order.
Summary
The petitioner, Akash Dilip Rathod, filed a writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition concerned a proposal submitted by the petitioner on 12 August 2022, which the Education Officer had not yet decided. The High Court examined whether the Education Officer was obligated to consider the proposal on its merits. The Court held that the Education Officer must decide the proposal within six weeks of receiving the order. Accordingly, the petition was disposed by directing the Education Officer to render a decision and communicate it to the petitioner.
Issues considered
- Whether the Education Officer is required to decide the petitioner's proposal dated 12.08.2022 on its merits within a specified time
Subjects
- writ petition
- education
- administrative law
- direction
- merits
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39685-DB
{1} 45-wp-10747-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
45 WRIT PETITION NO. 10747 OF 2026
Akash Dilip Rathod
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. R.V. Gunale h/f Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. N.D. Batule, AGP for State
.......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
1. The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No. 2-
Education Officer to decide the proposal of the Petitioner dated
12.08.2022, on its own merits, within a period of six weeks from the
date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate decision to the
Petitioner.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…