Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AKANSHA FASHIONS THR PROP JITEN M MANSUKHANEYversusTHE BOARD OF DIRECTOR OF BANK OF BARODA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was held to be infructuous and was therefore disposed.

Summary

Akansha Fashions filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Board of Directors of Bank of Baroda and others. The petition was pending for a considerable period. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the passage of time had rendered the petition ineffective. The Court examined whether the petition remained maintainable in view of the delay. It concluded that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition as infructuous and any pending applications were also dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition filed by Akansha Fashions remains maintainable despite the lapse of time

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • delay
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bank of Baroda

Judgment

                                                                                    13-WP-10751-2026.doc



                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        WRIT PETITION NO. 10751 OF 2026

                   Akansha Fashions                                             … Petitioner
                               Versus
                   The Board of Director of Bank of Baroda and                  … Respondents
                   others
SWEETY
RAJU
                                                        ******
BHALERAO

                   Adv. S. Tailor, a/w Ms. Hemali M. (through VC), i/b Nedumpara &
Digitally signed
by SWEETY
RAJU
BHALERAO
                   Nedumpara for Petitioner.
Date:
2026.08.28
17:27:20
+0530              Mr. Atul Gupta, a/w Adv. Archit Virmani, for Respondent No. 1.
                   Ms. Tanu N. Bhatia, AGP for Respondent/State.


                                                        ******
                                                      CORAM :         MANISH PITALE &
                                                                      SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT,JJ.
                                                         DATE     :   28th AUGUST 2026.
                   PC:


                   1.      The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that with the passage of

                   time, the Petition has been rendered infructuous.


                   2.      Hence the petition is disposed of as infructuuous.


                   3.      Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.




                        (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)                        (MANISH PITALE, J.)




                    Bhalerao                                                                         1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.