Bombay High Court
HUSENKHAN EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY UDGIR THR ITS SECRETARY MANJURKHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court cannot compel the State to decide on the proposal but may permit the petitioner to submit a fresh proposal.
Summary
The petitioner, Husenkhan Education and Welfare Society, filed a writ petition seeking a direction from the State of Maharashtra to decide on its 2010 proposal to open a new college at Udgir. The petition argued that the State had unduly delayed consideration of the proposal. The High Court examined whether it could compel the State to take a decision on the proposal. Finding no substantive basis to order the State to act, the Court instead granted the petitioner liberty to submit a fresh proposal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of, allowing the petitioner to approach the authorities anew.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court can direct the State to decide on the petitioner’s 2010 proposal for opening a new college at Udgir.
Subjects
- education
- college establishment
- writ petition
- administrative law
- public interest
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39643-DB
wp10763-26.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.10763 OF 2026
Husenkhan Education and Welfare Society, Udgir PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. Suhas P. Urgunde, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]
DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026
ORDER :
1. By this Petition, the Petitioner seeks direction to the
Respondents, to take decision on its proposal of opening new
College at Udgir, which was filed in the year 2010.
2. The Writ Petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the
Petitioner to submit fresh proposal.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp10763-26.doc
Checking your session…