Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AMKHIM HOLDINGS PVT. LTD., AND ORSversusTHE SENIOR POLICE INSPECTOR AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition on 16 December 2020 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. No petitioner or their counsel appeared for any hearing after filing. The court noted that the petitioners made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition at any time. It was observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in continuing the proceedings. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to pursue a filed writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • procedural default
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                 ssm                                                      72-wp1077.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 1077 OF 2021

            Amkhim Holdings Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.                              …..Petitioners

                     Vs.

            The Senior Police Inspector & Ors.                 …..Respondents
                             ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioners.
            Shri. Ashish I. Satpute APP, for the Respondent-State.
                               ____________________________________

                                                CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                             KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                  DATE :     29th AUGUST, 2026.

            P.C.:-

            1)              None for Petitioners when called out for hearing.

            2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

            16th December, 2020, neither the Petitioners nor their Advocates have taken

            any steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

            2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

            the Petition.

            3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                           (A.S. GADKARI, J.)



          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                            1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:07 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.