Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

CHANDRASHEKHAR DEVIDASRAO MORE AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Chandrashekhar Devidasrao More and another, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioners failed to appear when called. The court record shows that after 25 September 2023, neither the petitioners nor their counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioners were not interested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the judges dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal effectively ends the petition without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedural consequence when petitioners fail to appear and do not take steps to advance a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • procedural default

Judgment

                 ssm                                                    73-wp1080.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 1080 OF 2021

            Chandrashekhar Devidasrao More & Anr.                       …..Petitioners

                     Vs.

            The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                             …..Respondents

                                 ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioners.
            Shri. J.P. Yagnik APP, for the Respondent-State.
            Mr. Atul R. Patil through V.C. for the Respondent No.5.
                               ____________________________________

                                              CORAM :        A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                             KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                 DATE :      29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)              None for Petitioners when called out for hearing.

            2)              Record indicates that, after 25th September, 2023, neither the

            Petitioners nor their Advocates have taken any steps to circulate the

            Petition, even once.

            2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

            the Petition.

            3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                          (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                          1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:01 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.