Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AKHIL ANIL CHITREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Akhil Anil Chitre, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after March 3, 2021, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the court considered the petition to be abandoned. The judges dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution, thereby terminating the proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                 ssm                                                   75-wp1085.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 1085 OF 2021

            Akhil Anil Chitre                                          …..Petitioner

                     Vs.

            The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                            …..Respondents

                                ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre APP, for the Respondent-State.
                              ____________________________________

                                              CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                DATE :      29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)             Record indicates that, after 3rd March, 2021, neither the

            Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

            even once.

            2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                         (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                         1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:00 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.