Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KADUBI SHAHABUDDIN SAYYADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court directed respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner’s representation within six weeks of receipt of the order.

Summary

The petitioner, Kadubi Shahabuddin Sayyad, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the respondent No.2 to decide a representation dated 05-10-2021 that was pending before it. The petitioner later limited his prayer to only obtaining such a direction, withdrawing any broader relief. The High Court examined whether it could compel the administrative authority to adjudicate the pending representation within a specific timeframe. Relying on principles of administrative law and the court's inherent powers to issue directions in writ proceedings, the Court held that it could set a deadline for the decision. Consequently, the Court ordered respondent No.2 to decide the representation within six weeks of receiving a copy of the order. All other contentions raised by the petitioner were left open for future consideration.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can direct an administrative authority to decide a pending representation within a stipulated period

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • administrative law
  • representation
  • direction
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43068-DB
                                               1                             71.WP.1085.22.odt

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 1085 OF 2022

                                  KADUBI SHAHABUDDIN SAYYAD
                                            VERSUS
                             THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

                                                ...
             Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Narwade Vinayak Pandurangrao and
                                           Adv. Narwade Manjushri V.
                            AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.R. Wakale
                                                ...

                                      CORAM         : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                      ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                      DATE          : 16.09.2026

             PER COURT:

             1.        Since the petitioner has restricted his prayer seeking direction to

             decide the representation of the petitioner dated 05.10.2021 pending

             before respondent No. 2, the writ petition is disposed of by directing

             respondent No. 2 to decide the said representation within a period of

             six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

             2.        All contentions of the petitioner are kept open.




             (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                     (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)


             habeeb/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.