Bombay High Court
BAYAJA BHAGYA GAVALI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
Respondent No.2 must decide the petitioners' representation on its merits within twelve weeks of receipt of the Court's order.
Summary
The petitioners, Bayaja Bhagya Gavali and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition arose from a representation submitted by the petitioners on 24 July 2026, which the respondents had not decided upon. The principal issue was whether the respondent, specifically Respondent No.2, was required to adjudicate the representation within a reasonable time. The Court examined the delay and the petitioners’ right to a timely decision on their representation. Concluding that the delay was unjustified, the Court ordered Respondent No.2 to decide the representation on its merits within twelve weeks of receiving the order. The petition was consequently disposed of with this directive.
Issues considered
- Whether Respondent No.2 is obligated to decide the petitioners' representation filed on 24 July 2026 within a reasonable time
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- administrative law
- time‑bound decision
- High Court order
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39647-DB
wp10945-26.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.10945 OF 2026
Bayaja Bhagya Gavali and Another PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. G. D. Jain, Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. A. B. Girase, Government Pleader for Respondent - State
Mr. S. R. Dheple h/f Mr. R. S. Pawar, Advocate for Respondents
No.2 and 3
....…
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]
DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026
ORDER :
The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent
No.2 to decide representation of the Petitioners dated 24 th July,
2026, on its own merits, within a period of 12 weeks from the
date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the
decision to the Petitioners.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp10945-26.doc
Checking your session…