Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LAXMI CHANDRAKANT NANDU AND ANRversusDISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERTIVE SOCIETIVES AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the petition may be withdrawn and the petitioners are granted liberty to raise all issues before the Deputy Registrar.

Summary

The petitioners, Laxmi Chandrakant Nandu and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. They later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to raise all issues before the Deputy Registrar in the remanded proceedings. The learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Aseem Naphade, made the application. The Court considered whether such a withdrawal with liberty to pursue matters elsewhere was permissible. Finding no impediment, the Court granted leave to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed and the petitioners were allowed to raise their issues before the Deputy Registrar.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to raise all issues before the Deputy Registrar in the remanded proceedings

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • High Court of Bombay
  • procedural law
  • Deputy Registrar

Judgment

                      Neeta Sawant                                             908-WP-10948-2026.docx

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                             WRIT PETITION NO. 10948 OF 2026


                      Laxmi Chandrakant Nandu
                      and Anr.                                                       …..Petitioners

                                : Versus :

                      District Deputy Registrar through
                      The Government Pleader & Ors.                        ….Respondents
                      __________________________________________________________________

                      Mr. Aseem Naphade a/w. Mrs. Leena Shah and Mr. Dipen Furia, i/b. M/s. Shah
                           & Furia Associates, for the Petitioners.

                      Mr. Vijay Sharma, for Respondent No.3.

                      Mr. A.C. Bhadang, AGP for State.
                      __________________________________________________________________


                                                                   CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

                                                                   DATED :     25 AUGUST 2026.
                      P.C. :

                      1)              Mr. Naphade, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners,
                      on instructions, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the Petition with
                      liberty to raise all issues before the Deputy Registrar in the remanded
                      proceedings. The Writ Petition is accordingly permitted to be withdrawn and
NEETA                 disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
SHAILESH
SAWANT
Digitally signed by
NEETA SHAILESH
SAWANT
Date: 2026.08.25
15:04:43 +0530

                                                                         SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
                      ___________________________________________________________________________
                                                _____PAGE NO. 1 of 1____
                                                 Tuesday, 25 August 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.