Bombay High Court

YATIN KIRAN BHOGE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 must decide the fresh staff proposals, taking into consideration the Government Resolution dated 01.02.2000.

Summary

The petitioners, Yatin Kiran Bhoge and others, filed a writ petition alleging that Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 were refusing to accept staff proposals submitted by the Management and Head Master on 14 July 2026. The petitioners contended that the proposals must be decided in accordance with the Government Resolution dated 1 February 2000. The Court examined whether the respondents were bound by that resolution in evaluating the proposals. It directed Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to prepare fresh proposals for submission to Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 within two weeks. The Court further ordered that Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 decide on the proposals, taking the 2000 Government Resolution into account, within eight weeks of receipt. The writ petition was disposed with these directions.

Issues considered

Whether Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are required to consider the staff proposals in accordance with the Government Resolution dated 01.02.2000.

Subjects

writ petition
government resolution
staff approval
administrative law
Bombay High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39707-DB


                                                    {1}                wp10949-26.doc
                 drp
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  WRIT PETITION NO.10949 OF 2026

                 Yatin Kiran Bhoge and Others                         PETITIONERS

                        VERSUS

                 The State of Maharashtra and Others                 RESPONDENTS

                                                 .......
                 Mr. A. D. Khot h/f Mr. P. D. Bachate, Advocate for the Petitioners
                 Mr. S. R. Wakle, AGP for Respondent - State
                                                 ....…

                              [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
                                       ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]

                                       DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026

                 ORDER :


                 1.     Grievance of the Petitioner is that respondent Nos.3 and 4

                 are not accepting the proposals submitted by the Management

                 and Head Master dated 14th July, 2026.


                 2.     According to the Petitioners, said proposals are required to

                 be     decided   in   terms   of    Government   Resolution   dated

                 01.02.2000.


                 3.     The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing respondent

                 Nos. 5 and 6 to submit fresh proposal to respondent Nos.3 and 4

                 for approval of staff within a period of two weeks from today.
                                   {2}                   wp10949-26.doc

After such proposals are submitted, respondent Nos.3 and 4

shall   decide   the   same   by    taking   into   consideration   the

Government Resolution dated 01.02.2000, within a period of

eight weeks thereafter.



[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ]                   [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
         JUDGE                                      JUDGE

drp/wp10949-26.doc

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…