Bombay High Court
GITA BAL VIDYA MANDIR NAREGAON THR ITS DIRECTOR DATTATRAY U GANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court directed the respondents to examine the petitioners' reimbursement claims and, if found eligible, to pay the fees within the stipulated time.
Summary
The petitioners, two educational trusts, filed writ petitions seeking reimbursement of fees for the 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. They alleged that the State of Maharashtra and other respondents were liable to refund the fees collected from these students. The High Court examined whether the petitioners were entitled to such reimbursement under the RTE Act. The Court did not make a definitive ruling on entitlement but directed the respondents to independently scrutinise the petitioners' proposals and decide on the reimbursement within four weeks of receiving the order. If the petitioners are found eligible, the Court ordered that the reimbursement be paid within a further four weeks.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to reimbursement of fees for the 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009
- Whether the State and other respondents have a statutory duty to refund such fees
Legislation cited
Subjects
- Right to Education
- fee reimbursement
- RTE Act
- writ petition
- public authority
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39703-DB
{1} wp10952-26.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.10952 OF 2026
Gita Bal Vidya Mandir, Naregaon, Aurangabad PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. Adwait M. Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for Respondent - State
Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for Respondent No.4
....…
AND
WRIT PETITION NO.10967 OF 2026
Late Ramsing Bapuji Gram Sevan Mandal PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. Adwait M. Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner
Ms. Neha B. Kamble, AGP for Respondent - State
Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for Respondent No.4
.......
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]
DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026
ORDER :
1. By these Petitions, the Petitioners seek direction to the
Respondents to reimburse fees in respect of 25% students
admitted by the Petitioners under the Right of Children to Free
{2} wp10952-26.doc
and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
2. The Writ Petitions are disposed of by directing the
Respondents to undertake scrutiny of the proposals of the
Petitioners independently on their own merits and take
appropriate decisions as expeditiously as possible and in any
case, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of
copy of this order. If the Petitioners are found entitled to get the
reimbursement, the same shall be paid to them within a period
of four weeks thereafter.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp10952-26.doc
Checking your session…