Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAJEEV KAMALAKAR BHOSALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SOCIAL WELFARE COMMISSIONERATE AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajeev Kamalakar Bhosale, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and its Social Welfare Commissionerate. After the petition was filed, counsel for the petitioner sought leave of the court to withdraw the petition, stating it was filed under a misconception and should have been presented before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The court examined whether the petition was filed bonafide and considered the procedural propriety of allowing a withdrawal. It was satisfied that the petition was indeed filed bonafide despite the alleged misconception. Consequently, the court granted the petitioner's request and permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty as prayed for.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate forum for the grievance raised by the petitioner?
  • Whether a writ petition filed in the High Court can be withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • jurisdiction
  • administrative law
  • High Court

Judgment

          Digitally
          signed by                                                      16-WP-10966-2026.doc
          RUPALI
RUPALI    RAJESH
RAJESH    WAKODIKAR
WAKODIKAR Date:
          2026.08.28
          16:50:01        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          +0530


                             ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                               WRIT PETITION NO. 10966 OF 2026


                  Rajeev Kamalakar Bhosale                          ...Petitioner
                       Versus
                  The State of Maharashtra Thr.
                  Social Welfare Commissionerate & Ors.             ...Respondents


                  Mr. Sanjay Kshirsagar for the Petitioner.

                  Mr. R.M.Shinde, A.G.P for the Respondent-State.


                                             CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
                                                     SANDESH D. PATIL JJ.
                                            DATE : 27th AUGUST, 2026


                 P.C. :

                  1.          Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this

                  Court to withdraw the petition as according to him the petition was

                  bonafide filed under some misconception. The petition should have

                  been filed before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. We are

                  satisfied that the petition was filed bonafide.




   Wakodikar                                                                              1/2
                                                             16-WP-10966-2026.doc


            2.        Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed

            for.



            (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                       (M. S. KARNIK, J.)




Wakodikar                                                                     2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.