Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MONICA MANGESH SHIRKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Education Inspector must consider the petitioner's proposal within six weeks and provide an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties.

Summary

Monica Mangesh Shirke filed a writ petition challenging the seniority list of teachers at a school and submitted a proposal dated 6 February 2026 to the Education Inspector, Greater Mumbai. The petitioner sought a review of inter‑seniority and an opportunity for a hearing. The High Court directed the Education Inspector to consider the proposal within six weeks from the date of the order and to provide a hearing to all concerned parties. The court kept the petitioner's contentions open but disposed of the writ petition without awarding costs. The order was signed by Justices G. S. Kulkarni and Dr. Neela Gokhale.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Education Inspector is obligated to consider the petitioner's proposal on inter‑seniority of teachers within a specified period and afford a hearing to the concerned parties

Subjects

  • seniority
  • teachers
  • education
  • writ petition
  • administrative law

Judgment

                                                                   405- WP-10980-2026.DOC



              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                      WRIT PETITION NO. 10980 OF 2026


Monica Mangesh Shirke                                    ...Petitioner
      Versus
The State of Maharashtra
Thru Secretary & Ors.                                    ...Respondents
                                 _______
Mr. Vinayak Kumbhar, with Ashwini Bandiwadekar, for Petitioner.
Mr. P.N. Diwan, AGP for Respondents-State.


                                       _______

                                    CORAM:        G. S. KULKARNI &
                                                  DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

                                    DATE:         24 AUGUST 2026

P.C.

1.        Heard    Mr. Vinayak Kumbhar, learned Advocate appearing for the

Petitioner and the learned AGP representing the State.

2.        The Petitioner has submitted a proposal dated 6th February 2026 to

Respondent No.2-Education Inspector, Greater Mumbai, West Division, Mumbai,

raising the dispute of inter-se seniority of teachers working at Respondent No.4-

School as per the seniority list for the year 2025-26.

3.        Considering the averments made in the Petition and the reliefs sought, the

Respondent No.2 shall consider the proposal dated 6 th February 2026 submitted

by the Petitioner, within a period of 6 weeks from today, after giving an

opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties.




                                    Page 1 of 2
Shivgan
                                                                       405- WP-10980-2026.DOC



   4.                  Keeping all the contentions open in that regard, the Writ Petition

   stands disposed of. No costs.




   (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)                                    (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)



          Digitally
          signed by
          SHAMBHAVI
SHAMBHAVI NILESH
NILESH    SHIVGAN
SHIVGAN   Date:
          2026.08.25
          10:49:15
          +0530




                                           Page 2 of 2
   Shivgan


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.