Bombay High Court
VILAS PRABHAKAR CHAUDHARIversusCHAYA VILAS CHAUDHARI
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is infructuous and must be disposed of when the underlying substantive proceedings have been concluded.
Summary
The petitioner, Vilas Prabhakar Chaudhari, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 20.01.2023 passed by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge in a Hindu Marriage Petition (No.174 of 2019). The High Court noted that the underlying marriage petition had already been disposed of on 08.04.2024, leaving no pending relief. No counsel appeared to represent the petitioner when the matter was called. Consequently, the Court held that the writ petition could not proceed as there was nothing left to adjudicate. The petition was therefore declared infructuous and disposed of.
Issues considered
- What is the effect on a writ petition when the substantive suit it challenges has been fully disposed of?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil procedure
- jurisdiction
- petition disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39739
6-sr904.wp10998.2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
904 WRIT PETITION NO. 10998 OF 2023
Vilas Prabhakar Chaudhari
VERSUS
Chaya Vilas Chaudhar
----
None present for petitioner
----
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATE : AUGUST 29, 2026
ORDER :-
Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 20.01.2023 passed by
learned 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bhusawal, Dist. Jalgaon
below application Exh. 14 in Hindu Marriage Petition No.174 of 2019
the petitioner has filed present Writ Petition.
2. The report of the Registry shows that the main proceedings
i.e. H.M.P. No.174 of 2019 is already disposed of by the concerned
court on 08.04.2024. In view of the same, nothing survives in this
petition.
3. When the matter was called out nobody appeared to
represent the petitioner.
2 6-sr904.wp10998
4. In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands disposed of
as infructuous.
[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.]
………..
KBP
Checking your session…