Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MICHAEL GABRIELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and granted liberty to seek an alternate remedy.

Summary

Petitioner Michael Gabriel filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. He later applied for leave to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue an alternative legal remedy. The petitioner’s counsel, Ms. Shweta Rathod, moved the court for this withdrawal. The court examined whether such a withdrawal could be permitted and whether liberty to approach another forum could be granted. Finding no impediment, the court granted leave to withdraw and allowed the petitioner to seek an alternate remedy. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn, and the related interim application was also dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and be granted liberty to pursue an alternative remedy

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • alternate remedy
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                    sbw                                                 3-wp-110-2021+.doc




                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                     WRIT PETITION NO.110 OF 2021

                                                                    WITH

                                                  INTERIM APPLICATION NO.189 OF 2021

                             Michael Gabriel                                       … Petitioner

                                      V/s.

                             The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                       … Respondents




                             Ms. Shweta Rathod i/by Elixir Legal Services for the Petitioner.
                             Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, APP for the Respondent-State.
                             Mr. J.S. Kini a/w Mr. Aum Kini and Mr. Parth Kini i/by Sapna Krishnappa
                             for the Intervenor.
                             PSI D.R. Ghanvat, Pairavi Officer, Parksite Police Station, present.


                                                                CORAM :  A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                         KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                                  DATE : 7th September, 2026

                             P.C.:-

                             1)              Learned Advocate for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave

                             to withdraw Petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy, as may be

                             permissible in law.

                             1.1)            Leave and liberty granted.

          Digitally signed
          by SANDHYA
SANDHYA BHAGU
BHAGU   WADHWA
WADHWA Date:
        2026.09.09
          09:55:43 +0530
                                                                                                             1/2
     sbw                                                  3-wp-110-2021+.doc

2)            Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

3)            In view of the disposal of the Petition, Interim Application filed

therein is accordingly disposed off.



           (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                   (A.S. GADKARI, J.)




                                                                               2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.