Bombay High Court
DNYANESHWAR SANGRAM GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is dismissed as the issues are already decided in the earlier judgment.
Summary
The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Sangram Gaikwad, filed a writ petition challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The Court observed that the matter raised in the petition had already been decided by a coordinate bench of the same High Court in Writ Petition No.6549 of 2026. Relying on the reasoning of that earlier judgment, the Court found no fresh issue requiring adjudication. Consequently, the petition was dismissed. The order was delivered by Judges Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Abasaheb D. Shinde on 17 August 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the issues raised in the present writ petition are already covered by the judgment in Writ Petition No.6549 of 2026
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- precedent
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37333-DB
{1} wp11025-25.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.11025 OF 2025
Dnyaneshwar Sangram Gaikwad PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. A. R. Muley h/f Mr. M. P. Kale, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondent - State
.......
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]
DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2026
ORDER :
1. Indisputably, the issue raised in this petition is squarely
covered by the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of
this Court (Coram : Kishore C. Sant and Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ.)
in writ petition No.6549 of 2026 with connected matters, decided
on 30.07.2026.
2. For the reasons stated in the said judgment, the writ
petition is dismissed.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp11025-25.doc
Checking your session…