Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DNYANESHWAR SANGRAM GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed as the issues are already decided in the earlier judgment.

Summary

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Sangram Gaikwad, filed a writ petition challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The Court observed that the matter raised in the petition had already been decided by a coordinate bench of the same High Court in Writ Petition No.6549 of 2026. Relying on the reasoning of that earlier judgment, the Court found no fresh issue requiring adjudication. Consequently, the petition was dismissed. The order was delivered by Judges Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Abasaheb D. Shinde on 17 August 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the issues raised in the present writ petition are already covered by the judgment in Writ Petition No.6549 of 2026

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • precedent
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37333-DB


                                                 {1}                   wp11025-25.doc
                 drp
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 WRIT PETITION NO.11025 OF 2025

                 Dnyaneshwar Sangram Gaikwad                           PETITIONER

                        VERSUS

                 The State of Maharashtra and Others                 RESPONDENTS

                                                .......
                 Mr. A. R. Muley h/f Mr. M. P. Kale, Advocate for the Petitioner
                 Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondent - State
                                                .......

                             [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
                                      ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]

                                      DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2026

                 ORDER :

                 1.     Indisputably, the issue raised in this petition is squarely

                 covered by the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of

                 this Court (Coram : Kishore C. Sant and Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ.)

                 in writ petition No.6549 of 2026 with connected matters, decided

                 on 30.07.2026.


                 2.     For the reasons stated in the said judgment, the writ

                 petition is dismissed.



                 [ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ]                  [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
                          JUDGE                                     JUDGE

                 drp/wp11025-25.doc


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.