Bombay High Court
RAHUL GAJANAN YELAPUREversusGAJANAN BAPUSO YELAPURE AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Petitioners Vaishali and Anil filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against respondents Tikam, Gajanan Bapuso Yelapure and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners and the matter was listed for dismissal. The Court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- non‑prosecution
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
10-WP-11032-2023 (C).doc
Tikam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11032 OF 2023
VAISHALI Rahul Gajanan Yelapure ...Petitioner/s
ANIL Versus
TIKAM Gajanan Bapuso Yelapure and ors. ...Respondent/s
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI _________________________________________________________________
ANIL TIKAM
Date: None for Petitioner.
2026.08.24
14:37:26 +0530 Mrs. Ashwini A. Purav, AGP for Respondent- State of Maharashtra.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2026.
P.C. :
1. None present for Petitioner.
2. Matter is kept under the caption ‘for Dismissal’.
3. Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…