Bombay High Court
MEHER JAYSINGH DARANDALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS ADDITIONAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court directed Respondent No.3 to decide the petitioner’s representation on its merits within twelve weeks.
Summary
Meher Jaysingh Darandale filed Writ Petition No. 11037 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of Respondent No.3 regarding a representation submitted on 07 April 2026. The petitioner sought a directive for the respondent to consider the representation on its merits. The Court examined whether the respondent was obligated to adjudicate the representation within a reasonable time. It held that the respondent must decide the representation on its merits. Consequently, the Court ordered Respondent No.3 to render a decision within twelve weeks of receiving the copy of this order, and the petition was disposed.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate time frame for a government authority to decide a representation filed by a citizen?
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- administrative law
- government authority
- time limit
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39799-DB
1 55.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
55 WRIT PETITION NO. 11037 OF 2026
MEHER JAYSINGH DARANDALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL SECRETARY AND
OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Kotkar Tejas Sanjay
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. V.M. Kagne
…
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 01.09.2026
PER COURT :
. Writ Petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.3 to
decide the representation of the petitioner dated 07.04.2026, on its
own merits, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of
receipt of copy of this order.
( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. ) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. )
vsj..
Checking your session…