Bombay High Court
VARSHA CHANDJI BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that the second respondent must decide the representation on its merits within eight weeks.
Summary
Varsha Chandji Bhosale filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the failure of the second respondent to decide a representation submitted by the petitioner on 20 December 2024. The petitioner alleged that the undue delay infringed upon her right to a timely decision. The Court examined the necessity for administrative bodies to act within a reasonable period and to avoid prejudice to the petitioner. It held that the delay was unacceptable and that the respondent must adjudicate the representation on its merits. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the petition by directing the second respondent to decide the representation within eight weeks of receiving the order.
Issues considered
- Whether the second respondent's delay in deciding the petitioner's representation violates the petitioner's right to a timely decision
Subjects
- writ petition
- delay
- administrative law
- right to speedy justice
- representation
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39801-DB
1 57.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
57 WRIT PETITION NO. 11039 OF 2026
VARSHA CHANDJI BHOSALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Nirmal Ramchandra J.
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.R. Wakale
Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. S.S. Bora
…
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 01.09.2026
PER COURT :
. Writ Petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2 to
decide the representation of the petitioner dated 20.12.2024, on its
own merits, within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of
receipt of copy of this order.
( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. ) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. )
vsj..
Checking your session…