Bombay High Court
ORIX LEASING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES INDIA LTDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU G P AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is disposed as the direction for possession has been complied with.
Summary
Orix Leasing and Financial Services India Ltd. filed a writ petition seeking possession of a secured asset against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The court had earlier issued a direction on 23.09.2026 for the possession to be handed over to the petitioner. Respondents, through an affidavit by a senior police inspector, produced documents confirming that the possession was indeed transferred to the petitioner, a fact also acknowledged by the petitioner's counsel. The court found that the direction had been fully complied with. Consequently, no further orders were required and the petition was disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the direction dated 23.09.2026 for handing over possession of the secured asset has been complied with
Subjects
- writ petition
- possession
- secured creditor
- compliance
- disposal
Judgment
908_WP_11078_26.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11078 OF 2026
Orix Leasing and Financial Services India Ltd. … Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and others … Respondents
Mr. R. L. Motwani for petitioner.
Mr. S. P. Kamble, AGP for respondents – State authorities.
Mr. Yashwant G. Nikma, Senior Inspector of Police, Swargate Police
Station, Pune.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE &
SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ
DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026
P.C. :
. The learned AGP has tendered an affidavit of respondent No.3
– Senior Inspector of Police, Swargate Police Station, Pune, along
with documents. The same is taken on record.
2. The contents of the affidavit and documents filed therewith
show that the direction issued by this Court in the order dated
23.09.2026, has been duly complied with and physical possession of
the subject property (secured asset) has been handed over to the
petitioner (secured creditor). The aforesaid fact is confirmed by the
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
3. In view of the directions being complied with, no further
orders are necessary in this writ petition and accordingly, the same is
disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.)
Priya KambliDigitally signed
by PRIYA
PRIYA KAMBLI
KAMBLI Date:
2026.09.30 1/1
17:40:50 +0530
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.