Bombay High Court
BALU SANDU WAGHMAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that the respondent must decide the pending appeal on its merits within twelve weeks of receipt of the order.
Summary
Balu Sandu Waghmare filed a writ petition (No. 11099 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Tarek Mobin H. Shaikh, while the State was represented by Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP. The Court examined the pending Appeal No. 23/2025 that was before the respondent No.4. No detailed factual or legal reasoning was recorded in the order. The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondent to decide the appeal on its merits within twelve weeks of receiving the order.
Issues considered
- Whether the respondent should be directed to decide the pending Appeal No. 23/2025 on its merits within a specified time frame
Subjects
- writ petition
- administrative law
- delay in adjudication
- appeal
- court direction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:40296-DB
1 33-WP-11099-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 11099 OF 2026
BALU SANDU WAGHMARE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Tarek Mobin H. Shaikh, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondents/State
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 02nd SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
. The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent
No.4 to decide Appeal No.23/2025, after hearing all the concerned,
on it’s own merit, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of
receipt of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Checking your session…