Bombay High Court
SANTOSH TARASING CHAVAN AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that the respondent must decide the petitioners' representation on its merits within eight weeks of receipt of the order.
Summary
The petitioners, Santosh Tarasing Chavan and others, filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the State of Maharashtra decide their representation dated 20 June 2025. The petitioners alleged undue delay in the consideration of their representation. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, ordered that the respondent (State) must decide the representation on its merits within eight weeks of receiving the copy of the order. No substantive merits of the representation were addressed; the court merely directed timely adjudication. The petition was therefore disposed with the said direction.
Issues considered
- Whether the State of Maharashtra should be directed to decide the petitioners' representation dated 20/06/2025 on its merits within a reasonable time
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- direction
- high court
- procedural delay
- administrative law
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:40327-DB
1 51-WP-11117-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 11117 OF 2026
SANTOSH TARASING CHAVAN AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Suresh N. Rodge, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for Respondents/State
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 02nd SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
. The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent
No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners dated
20/06/2025, if not already decided, on it’s own merit, within a
period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Checking your session…