Bombay High Court
SYED SHAHEED UI HAQUE SYED ISHAQUEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
Respondent No.3 must decide the petitioner's representation on its merits within eight weeks of receipt of the order.
Summary
Syed Shaheed Ui Haque Syed Ishaque filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra regarding his representation dated 04/11/2025. The petitioners argued that the respondent had failed to consider the representation within a reasonable time. The Court examined whether the respondent was obligated to decide the representation on its merits. The Bench directed Respondent No.3 to decide the representation on its own merit within eight weeks of receiving the order. No substantive merits of the representation were adjudicated; the petition was disposed by this directive.
Issues considered
- Whether Respondent No.3 is required to decide the petitioner's representation dated 04/11/2025 on its merits within a reasonable time
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- administrative law
- high court
- direction
- Maharashtra
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:40326-DB
1 52-WP-11118-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 11118 OF 2026
SYED SHAHEED UI HAQUE SYED ISHAQUE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Shaikh Shakil U. and Mudassir H. Shaikh, Advocate for the
Petitioner
Ms. N. B. Kamble, AGP for Respondents/State
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 02nd SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
. The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent
No.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated
04/11/2025, if not already decided, on it’s own merit, within a
period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Checking your session…