Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KAMINI SOMBAHADUR GURUNG AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THORU. ITS PRINCIPAL SEC. REVENUE AND FOREST DEPT AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the respondents had complied with the direction to correct the mutation entry and therefore disposed of the writ petition.

Summary

The petitioners, Kamini Sombahadur Gurung and others, filed a writ petition challenging the mutation entry in land records. The High Court, in its earlier judgment dated 5 May 2026, directed the respondents to correct the mutation entry. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Sumedh Modak and Mr. Vivek Rane (via video‑conferencing), submitted that the corrected mutation entry had been furnished. The respondents, represented by M. M. Pable, A.G.P., confirmed compliance with the court's directions. The Court observed that the mandated correction had been effected and therefore ordered the disposal of the writ petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as the relief sought had been granted.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondents complied with the Court's direction to correct the mutation entry in the land records

Subjects

  • mutation entry
  • land records
  • writ petition
  • compliance
  • disposal

Judgment

NISHA
SANDEEP                                                                   904.-wp.11167.2026.doc
CHITNIS
Digitally signed by
NISHA SANDEEP                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CHITNIS                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Date: 2026.10.08
17:00:27 +0530
                                         WRIT PETITION NO.11167 OF 2026

                    Kamini Sombahadur Gurung and Ors.          ...Petitioners

                             Versus

                    The State of Maharashtra and Ors.          ...Respondents


                    Mr. Sumedh Modak with Mr. Vivek Rane (through video-
                    conferencing) i/b Mr. Vijay Killedar for the Petitioners.


                    Mr. M. M. Pable, A.G.P. for the Respondents-State.


                                                   CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE &
                                                          ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ.

                                                  DATE   : 7th OCTOBER 2026

                    P.C. :


                    1.                We are informed that the directions contained in the

                    Judgment dated 5th May 2026 have been complied with. The learned

                    proxy counsel appearing for Mr. Killedar, learned counsel for the

                    petitioners, through video-conferencing, submits that a copy of the

                    corrected Mutation Entry has been furnished to him.



    N. S. Chitnis                                                                           1/2
                                                                904.-wp.11167.2026.doc


                            In the wake of the aforesaid, since the directions for

                change in the Mutation Entry stand complied with, we dispose of the

                writ petition.



                ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J.                    BHARATI DANGRE, J.




N. S. Chitnis                                                                     2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.