Bombay High Court
BABAN GAMBHIR TADVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- RAJNISH R VYAS
Holding
The petition is infructuous and is therefore disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner, Baban Gambhir Tadvi, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the criminal prosecution arising from the FIR. The petitioner argued that the prosecution had already resulted in his acquittal, rendering the petition unnecessary. The respondent State of Maharashtra, represented by Mr. V.S. Badakh, opposed the petition. The Court examined whether the writ petition remained maintainable after the acquittal. Finding that the acquittal made the petition moot, the Court held the petition to be infructuous and disposed of it accordingly.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a criminal writ petition when the petitioner has already been acquitted in the underlying criminal case?
Subjects
- criminal writ petition
- acquittal
- infructuous
- High Court
- jurisdiction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:12527-DB
937-CRWP-1119-19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1119 OF 2019
Baban Gambhir Tadvi ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
State of Maharashtra and Another ..RESPONDENTS
....
Mr. V.S. Badakh, A.P.P. for respondent no.1 – State
....
CORAM : RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.
DATE : 24th MARCH, 2026
PER COURT :
. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the criminal
prosecution arising out of the impugned F.I.R. has resulted into acquittal of
the petitioner/ accused, and therefore, the petition has become infructuous.
2. In that view of the matter, criminal writ petition stands disposed of
as infructuous.
( RAJNISH R. VYAS, J. )
SSD
1 / 1
Checking your session…