Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

HARINDER SURINDER BAGAIversusRUKMANI BAGAI

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.

Summary

Harinder Surinder Bagai filed a writ petition (No. 11195 of 2025) in the Bombay High Court against Rukmani Bagai. The petitioner, through counsel Gaurav Srivastav, later sought leave to withdraw the petition. The respondent, Rukmani Bagai, was represented by counsel Taubon F. Irani and her team. The Court, after hearing both sides, considered the petitioner's request to withdraw. Finding no impediment, the Court allowed the withdrawal and ordered the petition to be disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                                           93-WP-11195-2025 (C).doc


                      Shubhada S Kadam


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         WRIT PETITION NO. 11195 OF 2025

                                            Harinder Surinder Bagai
                                                    versus
                                                Rukmani Bagai
                      _________________________________________________________________

                      Mr. Gaurav Srivastav along with Mr. Nishant Pawar i/b. S. K. Srivastav and
                      Co., Advocate for Petitioner.
                      Ms. Taubon F. Irani along with Ms. Divya Sharma and Ms. Moksha Kothari,
                      Advocate for Respondent.
                      _________________________________________________________________

                                                          CORAM        :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                          DATE         :   17th JUNE, 2026.
                      P.C. :

                      1.          Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for

                      respondent.

                      2.          Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the

                      petition.

                      3.          Considering the submission of learned counsel for the

                      petitioner, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.



                                                                     (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
SHUBHADA
SHANKAR
KADAM
Digitally signed by
SHUBHADA SHANKAR
KADAM
Date: 2026.06.19
11:38:30 +0530




                                                       Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.