Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MAROTI UMALA JADHAV AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the respondent must decide the petitioners' representations on their merits within twelve weeks of receipt of the order.

Summary

Petitioners Maroti Umala Jadhav and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a directive that the State of Maharashtra, through its respondent, decide the representations they submitted on 24 November 2014 and 19 March 2024. The petition alleged that the representations remained pending and that the delay violated applicable government policy and higher court orders. The Court examined the pending nature of the representations and the need for timely administrative action. It noted the Supreme Court’s earlier order and the High Court’s own prior directions on the matter. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the petition by ordering the respondent to decide the representations on their merits within twelve weeks of receiving a copy of the order, in line with government policy and relevant judicial pronouncements.

Issues considered

  • Whether the State of Maharashtra is required to decide the petitioners' pending representations dated 24‑11‑2014 and 19‑03‑2024 within a specified time frame

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • government policy
  • administrative delay
  • representation
  • directions
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:40495-DB
                                             1                              67.WP.11203.26.odt

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 11203 OF 2026

                              MAROTI UMALA JADHAV AND OTHERS
                                                VERSUS
                            THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH
                                   THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS
                                                   ...
                         Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Suresh S. Pidgewar
                                AGP for Respondents: Mr. N.D. Batule
                                                   ...

                                     CORAM         : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                     ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                     DATE          : 03.09.2026


             PER COURT:

                       Writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2 to

             decide      the   representations/proposals    of   the   petitioners    dated

             24.11.2014 and 19.03.2024, if not already decided, on its own merits,

             and in the light of the Government Policy, Hon’ble Supreme Court’s

             order, and this Court’s orders passed on time to time, within a period

             of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.



             (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                      (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




             habeeb/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.