Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GANESH SUNIL KOLIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Since the Caste Scrutiny Committee had already decided the controversy, the writ petition was held to be infructuous and was dismissed.

Summary

Ganesh Sunil Koli filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner argued that the Caste Scrutiny Committee had already resolved the dispute in question. The respondents did not appear or make submissions. The Court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel, noted that the matter had been finally decided by the Committee. Consequently, the Court found the petition to be infructuous. The writ petition was therefore disposed without further hearing.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the Caste Scrutiny Committee has already adjudicated the controversy

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • caste scrutiny committee
  • infructuous
  • high court
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Maharashtra

Judgment

                                                                      501-ASWP-11282-2025.DOC




                                                                                         Shephali

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 11282 OF 2025


                      Ganesh Sunil Koli                                          …Petitioner
                            Versus
                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                        …Respondents


                      Mr Sahil Chaudhari, i/b Sushant Yeramwar, for the Petitioner.


                                            CORAM:        SUMAN SHYAM &
                                                          SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
                                            DATED:        4TH MARCH 2026.
                      PC:-


                      1.     Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.
SHEPHALI
SANJAY                2.     Mr Sahil Chaudhari, learned Counsel appearing for the
MORMARE
Digitally signed by   Petitioner submits that the Caste Scrutiny Committee has already
SHEPHALI SANJAY
MORMARE
Date: 2026.03.04
15:33:56 +0530
                      decided the controversy and, therefore, this Writ Petition has
                      become infructuous.

                      3.     In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for
                      the Petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.




                      (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)                          (SUMAN SHYAM, J.)
                                                                                                {




                                                     Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.