Bombay High Court
GANESH SUNIL KOLIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
Since the Caste Scrutiny Committee had already decided the controversy, the writ petition was held to be infructuous and was dismissed.
Summary
Ganesh Sunil Koli filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner argued that the Caste Scrutiny Committee had already resolved the dispute in question. The respondents did not appear or make submissions. The Court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel, noted that the matter had been finally decided by the Committee. Consequently, the Court found the petition to be infructuous. The writ petition was therefore disposed without further hearing.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the Caste Scrutiny Committee has already adjudicated the controversy
Subjects
- writ petition
- caste scrutiny committee
- infructuous
- high court
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- Maharashtra
Judgment
501-ASWP-11282-2025.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11282 OF 2025
Ganesh Sunil Koli …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents
Mr Sahil Chaudhari, i/b Sushant Yeramwar, for the Petitioner.
CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM &
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATED: 4TH MARCH 2026.
PC:-
1. Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.
SHEPHALI
SANJAY 2. Mr Sahil Chaudhari, learned Counsel appearing for the
MORMARE
Digitally signed by Petitioner submits that the Caste Scrutiny Committee has already
SHEPHALI SANJAY
MORMARE
Date: 2026.03.04
15:33:56 +0530
decided the controversy and, therefore, this Writ Petition has
become infructuous.
3. In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for
the Petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.)
{
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…