Bombay High Court

AVINASH ASHOKRAO LANDGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the statutory amendment validly empowers the committee to review and reopen its own orders, and therefore the writ petitions were dismissed.

Summary

The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions challenging show‑cause notices issued by a committee, which sought explanations as to why their cases should not be reopened. The notices were dated 30 July 2026 and 6 August 2026. The State, through its Attorney‑General, contended that an amendment to the governing statute, effective 22 July 2026, vested the committee with the power to review and reopen its own orders from 23 July 2026 onward. The Court examined the amendment and concluded that the committee indeed possessed such power, rendering the petitioners' challenge untenable. Consequently, the Court found no ground to entertain the petitions and ordered the writ petitions to be disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the amendment to the statute effective 22 July 2026 confers on the committee the power to review and reopen its own orders.
Whether the petitioners can challenge the show‑cause notices issued by the committee on the ground of lack of such power.

Subjects

show cause notice
review of order
statutory amendment
writ petition
administrative law
jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:40161-DB


                                             1           4-wp 11222-2026+.odt



                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 11222 OF 2026

                 Sudhir Pandurang Kadam And Another                 .. Petitioners

                        Versus

                 The State Of Maharashtra Department
                 Of Tribal Development And Another                  .. Respondents

                                              AND
                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 11302 OF 2026

                 Narayan Uttamrao Landge                            .. Petitioner

                        Versus

                 The State Of Maharashtra And Another               .. Respondents

                                              AND
                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 11303 OF 2026

                 Avinash Ashokrao Landge                            .. Petitioner

                        Versus

                 The State Of Maharashtra And Another               .. Respondents
                                              AND
                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 11304 OF 2026

                 Ashok Vishwanath Landge                            .. Petitioner

                        Versus

                 The State Of Maharashtra And Another               .. Respondents
                                              AND
                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 11305 OF 2026

                 Uttam Vishwanath Landge                            .. Petitioner
                      Versus
                 The State Of Maharashtra And Another               .. Respondents
                               2              4-wp 11222-2026+.odt


                            AND
               WRIT PETITION NO. 11306 OF 2026

Sonali Uttamrao Landge                                   .. Petitioner

      Versus

The State Of Maharashtra And Another                     .. Respondents

                            AND
               WRIT PETITION NO. 11307 OF 2026

Deepali Uttamrao Landge                                  .. Petitioner

      Versus

The State Of Maharashtra And Another                     .. Respondents

                            AND
               WRIT PETITION NO. 11308 OF 2026

Rahul Ramrao Landge                                      .. Petitioner

      Versus

The State Of Maharashtra And Another                     .. Respondents

                            AND
               WRIT PETITION NO. 11309 OF 2026

Madan Laxmanrao Landge                                   .. Petitioner

      Versus

The State Of Maharashtra And Another                     .. Respondents

Mr. Sushant C. Yeramwar, Advocate for Petitioners.
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, Mr. S. R. Yadav-Lonikar, Mr. K. N. Lokhande,
Smt. S. S. Joshi, Mr. P. S. Patil, Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, Mr. R. S.
Wani, AGP’s for Respondents-State in respective matters.

                        CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                                JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
                        DATE       :   01st SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                                 3              4-wp 11222-2026+.odt


PER COURT :-

1.       Heard learned advocate for the petitioners.


2.       The petitioners are challenging show cause notices issued by

the committee – respondent No. 2 asking the petitioners as to why

the cases of petitioners shall not be reopened. The notices are

dated 30.07.2026 and 06.08.2026.


3.       The learned A.G.P., at the outset, raises the objection that,

now the committee is vested with the power to review its own

order. The said amendment is brought on the statute book on

22.07.2026       and   therefore, from     23.07.2026      onwards     the

committee has every power to reopen/review the cases.


4.       In view of the above, this Court finds that, there is no reason

to entertain the petitions. Therefore, the writ petitions stand

disposed of.



( JITENDRA JAIN, J.)                          ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )



P.S.B.

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…