Bombay High Court
SYED TANVEER A RAHIMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that the respondent must decide the petitioner’s representation on its merits within two weeks of the order.
Summary
Syed Tanveer A. Rahim filed a writ petition (No. 11319 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner submitted a representation dated 13 August 2026, the content of which was not detailed in the order. The principal issue before the Court was whether the State, as respondent No.2, should adjudicate the petitioner’s representation on its merits. The Court, without elaborating on substantive arguments, directed the respondent to decide the representation within two weeks of receiving the order. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of, with the specific direction that the representation be considered on its merits within the stipulated time.
Issues considered
- Whether the respondent State is required to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation dated 13‑08‑2026 on its merits
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- High Court
- order
- disposal
- jurisdiction
- state
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:40088-DB
1 23.WP.11319.26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 11319 OF 2026
SYED TANVEER A. RAHIM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH
ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Baig Mirza Mazhar Javed
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. B.B. Bhise
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 01.09.2026
PER COURT:
Writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2 to
decide the representation of the petitioner dated 13.08.2026, on its
own merits, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt
of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
habeeb/
Checking your session…