Bombay High Court
RAHUL KISHOR PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition, directing that the matter be heard on 04‑09‑2026 and a judgment delivered by 05‑09‑2026.
Summary
Petitioner Rahul Kishor Patil filed a writ petition fearing loss of his admission to an M.Tech program because he could not produce a Scheduled Tribe validity certificate, whereas a vigilance report had been accepted for his brother. He alleged inaction by the committee handling his case and sought judicial intervention. The respondents, represented by the State’s AGP, indicated that a hearing would be scheduled for 4 September 2026 with a judgment to be delivered by the following afternoon. The Court accepted this timetable and ordered the petition to be disposed of without further substantive examination. It also urged the committee members to act promptly and avoid any misconduct.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to relief to secure his M.Tech admission pending submission of a Scheduled Tribe certificate
- Whether the court should direct the committee to expedite its proceedings
Subjects
- admission
- Scheduled Tribe certificate
- writ petition
- procedural delay
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39943-DB
1 903-wp 11367-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 11367 OF 2026
Rahul Kishor Patil .. Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra
Through Its Secretary And Others .. Respondents
Mr. Chandrakant R. Thorat, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP for Respondents-State.
Mr. M. D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 4.
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : 01st SEPTEMBER, 2026.
PER COURT :-
1. Heard the parties.
2. The peculiar facts of the case that the petitioner would lose
his admission to M.Tech course. He is not in a position to submit
the validity certificate showing that he belongs to a Scheduled
Tribe. It is submitted that, though the common vigilance cell’s
report is received on 08.06.2026, the same is accepted only in
case of his real brother and not in the case of petitioner. Because
of this inaction the petitioner apprehends that, no proceeding will
2 903-wp 11367-2026.odt
be concluded.
3. The learned A.G.P. on specific instructions from the
committee makes a statement that hearing would be given to the
petitioner on 04.09.2026 and the judgment would be delivered at
the most by afternoon on 05.09.2026.
4. By accepting this statement, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
5. Though certain earlier orders are pointed out to this Court,
this Court for the present would not go into the same. However, it
is expected of the committee members to act promptly and to see
that no finger is pointed out at their conduct.
( JITENDRA JAIN, J.) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )
P.S.B.
Checking your session…