Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KAVITA SHIVAJI KHAIRNAR AND ANOTHERversusANIL PRABHAKAR DESHMUKH AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Summary

Petitioners Kavita Shivaji Khairnar and another filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. The petition was pending for a considerable period. The petitioners' counsel argued that the passage of time rendered the petition infructuous. The Court examined the claim of delay and found that the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous due to the lapse of time.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • delay

Judgment

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

            69 WRIT PETITION NO. 11370 OF 2026

          KAVITA SHIVAJI KHAIRNAR AND ANOTHER
                          VERSUS
         ANIL PRABHAKAR DESHMUKH AND ANOTHER
                             ...
    Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Sant Tapan Kishor.
Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Santosh Pawde h/f Mr. Bhosale
                      Mahesh Kalidas.
                             ...

                      CORAM : MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.
                      DATE : 05.10.2026

PER COURT :-


1.      Learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that, by

passage of time, writ petition has become infructuous.


2.      In view thereof, Writ Petition is disposed of as

infructuous.




                             (MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.)

                              ...

vmk/-


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.