Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DILBARSING MEHASING KANDOLAversusTHE UNION OF INDIA THR THE DEPUTY SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Respondent No.4 must decide the petitioner's representation on its merits within eight weeks of receiving the Court's order.

Summary

Dilbarsing Mehasing Kandola filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the failure of Respondent No.4 to decide his representation dated 23 April 2025. The petitioner alleged undue delay and sought a directive for the representation to be adjudicated. The Court examined whether the administrative authority had unreasonably delayed its decision, invoking principles of natural justice and timely administration. Finding no satisfactory explanation for the delay, the Court ordered Respondent No.4 to decide the representation on its merits. The order mandated that the decision be rendered within eight weeks of receipt of the copy of the order, and the petition was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate remedy for the petitioner's grievance regarding the delayed decision on his representation dated 23 April 2025?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • administrative delay
  • representation
  • high court order
  • natural justice

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41437-DB
                                            1                              48.WP.11456.26.odt

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 11456 OF 2026

                               DILBARSING MEHASING KANDOLA
                                              VERSUS
                               THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH
                            THE DEPUTY SECRETARY AND OTHERS
                                                  ...
                Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. S.P. Tiwari h/f. Mr. Vikrant P. Raje
                           AGP for Respondents/State : Ms. S.S. Joshi
                        Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. Rahul Bagul
                                                  ...

                                    CORAM         : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                    ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                    DATE          : 07.09.2026


             PER COURT:

                       Writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.4 to

             decide the representation of the petitioner dated 23.04.2025, if not

             already decided, on its own merits, within a period of eight (8) weeks

             from the date of receipt of copy of this order.



             (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                   (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




             habeeb/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.