Bombay High Court
SHAIKH JAVED S/O. SHAIKH GULAM RASOOL (C-8193)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the time for seeking relief has elapsed.
Summary
The petitioner, Shaikh Javed, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the order dated 03.08.2021 that refused him parole leave. The petition sought relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The Court observed that, due to the passage of time, the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the Court held that the petition had become infructuous. The petition was therefore disposed of without any order in favour of the petitioner.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal writ petition challenging the refusal of parole leave is maintainable after the lapse of a considerable period.
Subjects
- parole
- criminal writ petition
- High Court
- petition dismissed
- time bar
- jurisdiction
Judgment
(1)
921- Cri. W. P. 1150-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1150 OF 2021
SHAIKH JAVED S/O. SHAIKH GULAM RASOOL (C-8193)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
…..
APP for Respondents: Mr. R. D. Raut
…..
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.
DATED : August 21, 2026
ORDER:-
1. None for the petitioner.
2. The petition is filed for challenging the order dated 03.08.2021,
under which parole leave was refused to the petitioner. However, by
the passage of time, this petition must have become infructuous.
3. In view of the same, the petition stands disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
YSK/
Checking your session…