Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH JAVED S/O. SHAIKH GULAM RASOOL (C-8193)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the time for seeking relief has elapsed.

Summary

The petitioner, Shaikh Javed, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the order dated 03.08.2021 that refused him parole leave. The petition sought relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The Court observed that, due to the passage of time, the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the Court held that the petition had become infructuous. The petition was therefore disposed of without any order in favour of the petitioner.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal writ petition challenging the refusal of parole leave is maintainable after the lapse of a considerable period.

Subjects

  • parole
  • criminal writ petition
  • High Court
  • petition dismissed
  • time bar
  • jurisdiction

Judgment

                                    (1)
                                               921- Cri. W. P. 1150-2021.odt
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

            CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1150 OF 2021

       SHAIKH JAVED S/O. SHAIKH GULAM RASOOL (C-8193)
                            VERSUS
          THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
                               …..
           APP for Respondents: Mr. R. D. Raut
                              …..

                   CORAM :        SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, &
                                  VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.

                   DATED :        August 21, 2026

ORDER:-

1.     None for the petitioner.

2.     The petition is filed for challenging the order dated 03.08.2021,

under which parole leave was refused to the petitioner. However, by

the passage of time, this petition must have become infructuous.

3.     In view of the same, the petition stands disposed of.




(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)              (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
      JUDGE                                  JUDGE

YSK/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.