Bombay High Court
CHAITANYA RAVIKIRAN NAGTILAKversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SEC. TRIBAL DEV. DEPT. AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The six‑month extension for submitting caste validity certificates must be made applicable to Scheduled Tribes, Scheduled Castes, Vimukta Jatis and Nomadic Tribes, and the petitioner is entitled to provisional admission while the Scrutiny Committee decides his claim within four months.
Summary
The petitioner, Chaitanya Ravikiran Nagtilak, sought a caste validity certificate for Scheduled Tribe status to avoid cancellation of his admission to the College of Agriculture, Latur. He alleged that the Government Resolution dated 2 July 2026, which granted a six‑month extension for submitting caste certificates, excluded Scheduled Tribes, Scheduled Castes, Vimukta Jatis and Nomadic Tribes. Relying on the Nagpur Bench decision in Aditi D/o Ramsing Jadhao v. Vice‑Chairman, the Court held that there is no justification for excluding these categories and extended the benefit to them. Accordingly, the Court directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Pune Division, to decide the petitioner’s claim within four months and ordered the State CET Cell to grant provisional admission without the certificate, subject to the final decision. The petition was disposed without any order as to costs.
Issues considered
- Whether the Government Resolution dated 2 July 2026, which provides a six‑month period for submission of caste validity certificates only to SEBC and OBC candidates, violates the principle of equality by omitting Scheduled Tribes, Scheduled Castes, Vimukta Jatis and Nomadic Tribes.
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to provisional admission pending the issuance of a Scheduled Tribe validity certificate.
- Whether the Scrutiny Committee must be directed to decide the caste claim within a specified time frame.
Subjects
- caste validity certificate
- reservation
- Scheduled Tribe
- provisional admission
- government resolution
- Scrutiny Committee
- equality
- admission cancellation
Judgment
914-WP-11528-26.doc
Sharayu Khot.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11528 OF 2026
Chaitanya Ravikiran Nagtilak …Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents
----------
Mr. R.K. Mendadkar a/w Mr. Siddhant Sawai and Ms. Priyanka Shaw
for the Petitioner.
Smt. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Nikhil Chavan, for the Respondent No. 3-CET Cell.
----------
CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA J
FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J
DATE : 3 September 2026
ORDER :
1. The Writ Petition has been moved on ground of urgency,
in view of the Petitioner requiring to submit Caste Validity Certificate
on or before 7th September 2026 having been allotted admission by
SHARAYU
PANDURANG
KHOT
the Respondent No. 3 to the College of Agriculture, Latur. Failure to
Digitally
signed by
SHARAYU
PANDURANG
KHOT
Date:
2026.09.05
submit the Caste Validity Certificate may result in the Respondent
11:38:10
+0530
No.3 cancelling the Petitioner's allotment to the College of
1/6
914-WP-11528-26.doc
Agriculture, Latur. The grievance being that inspite of Application
having been made for Caste Validity Certificate on 11th November
2024, the Respondent No. 2 - Scrutiny Committee has till date not
decided on the Petitioner’s Tribe Validity claim.
2. The Petitioner by way of amendment of the Petition has
impugned the Government Resolution dated 2nd July 2026 in that it
omits the “Scheduled Tribe” category from the class of candidates
granted six months to submit their Caste Validity Certificate. This is
with a view that students may not face any difficulty in the admission
process and in order to avoid admission loss to them.
3. Mr. Mendadkar, the learned Counsel appearing for the
Petitioner, has placed reliance upon a decision of this Court (Nagpur
Bench) in Aditi D/o Ramsing Jadhao Vs. The Vice-Chairman/Member
Secretary, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee,
Yavatmal & Anr.1. This Court has in a similar case considered the said
Government Resolution dated 2nd July 2026 granting a period of six
months from date of admission to the candidates belonging to
reserved categories, viz. SEBC and OBC, for submitting Caste
1 Writ Petition No. 6545 of 2026 order dated 24th August 2026
2/6
914-WP-11528-26.doc
Certificates and Caste Validity Certificates. This Court has not found
any reasons as to why such benefit of six months period should not
be granted to other categories such as “Scheduled Tribes, Scheduled
Castes, Vimukta Jatis and Nomadic Tribes”. This Court has
accordingly, directed the Respondent No.1 – State / Scheduled Tribe
Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Yavatmal to decide the caste
claim of the Petitioner within a period of four months from the date
of the said order. Further, it was directed that admission process of
the Petitioner for admission to First Year M.B.B.S. course should be
processed by Respondent No.2 - State CET Cell and provisional
admission should be granted to her. Respondent No.2 - State CET
Cell was also directed to consider the candidature of the Petitioner
from the reserved category, i.e. Scheduled Tribe category. The Writ
Petition had been disposed of accordingly.
4. Mr. Mendadkar has sought for a similar order to be
passed in the present Petition.
5. The learned AGP appearing for the Respondent Nos. 1
and 2, has submitted that as per instructions of the State General
Administration Department, the purpose of issuing Government
3/6
914-WP-11528-26.doc
Resolution dated 2nd July 2026 is that since reservation has been
newly made applicable to Socially and Economically Backward
Classes (SEBC), and time would be required for students holding
Kunbi Caste Certificates issued on the basis of records traced by the
Committee constituted under the Chairmanship of the Honorable
Justice Shri. Sandeep Shinde (retired) to obtain Caste Validity
Certificate, in order for these students not to face any difficulty in the
admission process and/or to avoid academic loss to them, the said
Government Resolution grants by way of a one time opportunity, an
extension of six months to the candidates belonging to SEBC and
OBC for submission of their Caste Certificates.
6. We have considered the aforesaid purpose for issuing the
Government Resolution dated 2nd July 2026. However, we are of the
same view as that taken by this Court (Nagpur Bench) vide order
dated 24th August 2026 that there are no reasons as to why such
benefit of six months period should not be granted to other
categories, viz. “Scheduled Tribes, Scheduled Castes, Vimukta Jatis
and Nomadic Tribes”. We find from several cases which come up
before this Court that the Scrutiny Committee takes an inordinate
period of time for deciding the Caste Validity claims, and which
4/6
914-WP-11528-26.doc
results in several Petitions being filed before this Court.
7. Accordingly, the students are unable to submit the Caste
Validity Certificate during the prescribed period for admission to their
respective courses, and resulting in their admissions being liable to
be cancelled on that ground.
8. We accordingly, consider it appropriate in these
circumstances and in the interest of the students to direct the
Respondent-State to take a decision on making the said Government
Resolution dated 2nd July 2026 applicable to other categories,
“Scheduled Tribes, Scheduled Castes, Vimukta Jatis and Nomadic
Tribes”.
9. In the circumstances of the present case, we direct the
Respondent No. 2 – The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny
Committee, Pune Division to decide the caste claim of the Petitioner
within a period of four months from today.
10. The Respondent No.3 - State CET Cell shall consider the
admission of the present Petitioner from the Scheduled Tribe
5/6
914-WP-11528-26.doc
category to the B.E. course at College of Agriculture, Latur and grant
provisional admission without insisting upon submission of Tribe
Validity Certificate.
11. The admission to be granted by the College of
Agriculture, Latur shall be subject to the final outcome of the Tribe
Validity claim of the Petitioner decided by the Respondent No.2 -
Scrutiny Committee.
12. The Writ Petition is disposed of in these terms. There
shall be no order as to costs.
[FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [R.I. CHAGLA J.]
6/6
Checking your session…