Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

APARNA AJITKUMAR PATIL NEE. SUMAN VISHNU SATHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court directs the Deputy Director of Education to decide the approval proposal within six weeks.

Summary

The petitioner, Aparna Ajitkumar Patil, filed a writ petition seeking upgradation to a full‑time aided Assistant Teacher post and approval of the appointment. While the upgradation was granted during the pendency of the petition, the approval of the appointment remained pending. The petitioner complied with the deficiencies pointed out by the authorities on 30‑06‑2026, and the proposal was awaiting decision by the Deputy Director of Education. The Court examined the delay and directed the Deputy Director to decide the approval expeditiously, specifying a six‑week deadline from the date of the order. Accordingly, the petition was disposed with the said direction.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Respondent's delay in approving the petitioner's appointment as full‑time aided Assistant Teacher warrants judicial intervention.

Subjects

  • appointment
  • education
  • public service
  • writ petition
  • administrative delay
  • full‑time aided post

Judgment

                                                         82-WP-11585-2025.doc


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                       CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                    WRIT PETITION NO. 11585 OF 2025

Aparna Ajitkumar Patil Nee. Suman Vishnu Sathe           ...Petitioner.
        Versus
The State Of Maharashtra
Thr. The Secretary And Others                            ...Respondents.

                                 ——————
Mr. Prashant Bhavake for the Petitioner.
Ms. Tejas J. Kapre, AGP for the Respondent-State.
                                 ——————

                                   Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                               Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                   Date      : September 15, 2026.

P. C. :

1.        The Petition initially sought the relief of upgradation of the

Petitioner to the full-time aided post of Assistant Teacher and for grant

of approval. During the pendency of the Petition, the Petitioner was

upgraded to the full-time aided post of Assistant Teacher and the

grievance which remains to be addressed is the decision on the proposal

submitted for approval to the appointment of the Petitioner as full-time

aided Assistant Teacher.

2.        The deficiencies communicated have been duly complied with on

30.06.2026. The proposal is pending with Respondent No.4 – Deputy

Director of Education. The Respondent No.4 is directed to decide the



Sameer                              1 of 2
                                                           82-WP-11585-2025.doc


proposal expeditiously and, in any event, within a period of six weeks

from today.

3.       The Petition is disposed of in the above terms.




 [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                        [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]




Sameer                             2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.