Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUBHASH SHAKHARAM SHEJWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Subhash Shakharam Shejwal filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1160 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The Court, after hearing counsel, expressed its disinclination to grant any relief on the previous date of hearing and adjourned the matter to allow the petitioner to obtain further instructions. On the subsequent date, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, noting the petitioner’s desire to discontinue the proceedings, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to any relief under the criminal writ petition

Subjects

  • criminal writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41220




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                           20 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1160 OF 2026

                                SUBHASH SHAKHARAM SHEJWAL
                                             VERSUS
                          THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                                ...
           Mr. Avinash Rangnathrao Salve, Advocate for the Petitioner
           Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for the Respondent/State

                                                       CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
                                                       DATED     : 7th SEPTEMBER, 2026

           PER COURT :-

           1.    After hearing the learned Advocates for the parties, and as this Court

           had expressed its disinclination to grant any relief to the petitioner on the last

           date of hearing, the petition was adjourned to enable the learned Advocate for

           the petitioner to obtain instructions.

           2.    Today, learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw

           the petition.

           3.    In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                                  ( R. M. JOSHI, J.)
           ssp




           20 WP 1160.2026.odt                                                         1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.