Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

CYRIL NIKODEMAS BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the Education Officer must decide the pending proposal within four weeks of the order.

Summary

The petitioner, a qualified teacher, was appointed as Shikshan Sevak (Secondary) by a minority educational institution in 2019. The institution forwarded his proposal for personal approval to the Education Officer (Secondary) of the Zilla Parishad, Pune on 19 August 2020. Despite repeated follow‑ups, the approval remained pending for over six years. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the Education Officer to decide the proposal within a reasonable time. The Court directed the Education Officer to decide the pending proposal within four weeks of the order and disposed of the petition without costs.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Education Officer is required to decide the pending proposal for personal approval of the petitioner's appointment within a reasonable time.

Subjects

  • appointment
  • personal approval
  • administrative delay
  • writ petition
  • education
  • minority institution

Judgment

                                                               406- WP(L)-15111-2026.DOC



             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                      WRIT PETITION NO.11603 OF 2026



Cyril Nikodemas Bhosale                                             ...Petitioner

          Versus

The State of Maharashtra

Thr, Its Principal Secretary & Ors.                              ...Respondents

                                      _______

Mr Sachin Pawar, i/b Shailesh Chavan, for Petitioner.

Ms P M Joshi Deshpande, AGP for Respondents-State.

                                      _______

                             CORAM:        G. S. KULKARNI &
                                           DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
                             DATE:         10th SEPTEMBER 2026
P.C.

    1. Heard Mr. Pawar learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Ms.

          Deshpande learned AGP representing the State.

    2. The Petitioner is a qualified teacher who was appointed as Shikshan Sevak

          (Secondary) by Respondent No.5 - The Poona Diocesan Educational

          Society (a minority educational institution running St. Joseph Boys High

          School, Khadki, Pune, which serves minority students) vide appointment

          order dated 01/09/2019. The proposal for personal approval of the

          Petitioner's appointment as Shikshan Sevak (Secondary) was forwarded by


                                   Page 1 of 2
Shivgan
                                                                 406- WP(L)-15111-2026.DOC



          the institution through the headmaster to the office of Respondent No.3 -

          Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Pune on 19 th August 2020,

          with all requisite details and documents. Despite repeated follow-ups and

          personal visits to the office of Respondent No.3 as well as the Divisional

          Deputy Director of Education, Pune, the said proposal has remained

          pending for more than 6 years, without any decision being taken thereon.

    3. By this Writ Petition, the Petitioner seeks a direction to Respondent No.3 -

          Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Pune, to decide the proposal

          dated 19/08/2020 for personal approval of the Petitioner's appointment as

          Shikshan Sevak (Secondary) in St. Joseph Boys High School, Khadki, Pune,

          in a time-bound manner.

    4. Considering the averments made in the Petition and the reliefs sought,

          Respondent No.3 is directed to consider and decide the proposal dated

          19/08/2020 for personal approval of the Petitioner's appointment as

          Shikshan Sevak (Secondary), within a period of four weeks from the date on

          which this order is communicated to it.

    5. Keeping all the contentions open in that regard, the Writ Petition stands

          disposed of. No costs.




(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J)                                   (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)


          Digitally
          signed by
          SHAMBHAVI
SHAMBHAVI NILESH
NILESH    SHIVGAN
SHIVGAN   Date:
          2026.09.16
          12:19:03
          +0530



                                    Page 2 of 2
Shivgan


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.