Bombay High Court
AJINATH JAGANNATH KIRTANE AND OTHERSversusTHE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that Respondent No.6 must decide the pending representation on its merits within six weeks.
Summary
The petitioners, Ajinath Jagannath Kirtane and others, filed a writ petition challenging the inaction of Respondent No.6 regarding a representation they submitted on 16 January 2024. The petition sought a directive for the respondent to consider the representation on its merits. The Court examined whether the respondent was obligated to decide the pending representation and found that the delay was unjustified. Consequently, the Court ordered Respondent No.6 to decide the representation, if not already done, on its own merit within six weeks of receiving the order. The petition was thereby disposed with this direction.
Issues considered
- Whether Respondent No.6 is required to decide the petitioners' representation dated 16/01/2024 on its merits
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- administrative law
- high court
- directions
- aurangabad
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41505-DB
1 53-WP-11667-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 11667 OF 2026
AJINATH JAGANNATH KIRTANE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Babasaheb R. Borkar, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. M. K. Goyanka, AGP for Respondents/State
Mr. Nitin S. Salunke, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 6
…
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 08th SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
. The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent
No.6 to decide the representation of the petitioners dated
16/01/2024, if not already decided, on it’s own merit, within a
period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Checking your session…