Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KOYTA INFOTECH PRIVATE LTD THR ITS DIRECTOR SARIKA RAJENDRA LAADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE DEPUTY SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that Respondent No.3 must decide the petitioner’s representation/application on its merits within eight weeks of receipt of the order.

Summary

Koyta Infotech Private Ltd, through its director, filed Writ Petition No. 11796 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of a government department. The petitioner sought a direction that Respondent No.3 decide the representation/application dated 14 July 2026 on its merits. The State of Maharashtra, as Respondent, opposed the petition. After hearing counsel Mr. B.A. Chavan for the petitioner and Mr. V.M. Kagne for the State, the Court held that the petitioner was entitled to a timely decision. Consequently, the Court ordered Respondent No.3 to decide the representation within eight weeks of receipt of the order. The petition was disposed by this procedural direction without addressing the substantive merits of the representation.

Issues considered

  • Whether Respondent No.3 should be directed to decide the petitioner’s representation/application dated 14 July 2026 on its merits within a specified time

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • administrative law
  • representation
  • decision within time
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41884-DB
                                             1                               13.WP.11796.26.odt

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 11796 OF 2026

                             KOYTA INFOTECH PRIVATE LTD THROUGH
                              ITS DIRECTOR SARIKA RAJENDRA LAAD
                                            VERSUS
                             THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH
                               THE DEPUTY SECRETARY AND OTHERS

                                                   ...
                             Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. B.A. Chavan
                             AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. V.M. Kagne
                                                   ...

                                    CORAM          : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                     ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                    DATE           : 09.09.2026

             PER COURT:

                       Writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.3 to

             decide the representation/application of the petitioner dated

             14.07.2026, on its own merits, within a period of eight (8) weeks

             from the date of receipt of copy of this order.



             (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                    (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




             habeeb/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.