Bombay High Court
MOBIN SHAIKH MUNIRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is not maintainable as an alternate efficacious remedy exists, and the petitioner must first approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
Summary
The petitioner, Mobin Shaikh Munir, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought relief without first approaching the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The Court examined whether the petition was maintainable given the existence of an alternate efficacious remedy. It held that the petitioner must first avail the alternative remedy before seeking judicial intervention. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition is maintainable when an alternate efficacious remedy is available under the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
Subjects
- writ petition
- alternative remedy
- jurisdiction
- administrative law
- Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42028-DB
wp11807-26.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.11807 OF 2026
Mobin Shaikh Munir PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. Sachin S. Randive, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mrs. Saie S. Joshi, AGP for Respondent - State
.......
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]
DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2026
ORDER :
Since, alternate efficacious remedy is available to the
Petitioner to approach Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, the
Writ Petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the Petitioner to
avail the alternate remedy.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp11807-26.doc
Checking your session…