Bombay High Court
VIKAS RAMKISHAN RENGEversusMADHAV TUKARAM PHAD AND ANOTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court held that the status‑quo must be maintained until the suit is finally decided and disposed of the writ petition without addressing the merits.
Summary
The petitioner challenged a 2015 order of the Ad‑hoc District Judge‑2, Parbhani, which had upheld a lower court's decision in a civil suit concerning a portion of property sold under a sale deed. The High Court, noting that both parties agreed that justice would be served by maintaining the interim status‑quo, directed that the status‑quo be continued until the final disposal of the suit. The Court expressly stated that it was not deciding the merits of the underlying dispute and left all contentions open. It further directed the trial court to expedite the suit and render a decision on merits within one year. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without a merits determination.
Issues considered
- Whether the ad‑interim status‑quo order should be continued pending final disposal of the civil suit
- Whether the writ petition should be disposed without adjudicating the merits of the underlying suit
Subjects
- status quo
- interim order
- writ petition
- civil suit
- justice
- expedited proceedings
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:44544
43 WP No.11836.2015
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 11836 OF 2015
VIKAS RAMKISHAN RENGE
VERSUS
MADHAV TUKARAM PHAD AND ANOTHERS
***
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. S. Bhapkar h/f Mr. V. D.
Salunke
Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjay V. Mundhe
***
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : 29th September, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. The petitioner has challenged the judgment and order
dated 28.10.2015 rendered by the learned Ad-hoc District Judge–2,
Parbhani, in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 66 of 2015, endorsing the order
dated 12.10.2015 rendered by the learned 2nd Civil Judge, Junior
Division, Parbhani, below Exhibit 5 in Regular Civil Suit No. 314 of
2014.
2. Vide order dated 19.08.2016, this Court directed to
maintain status quo in respect of the portion indicated to be the
part of the sale deed.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the
respondents are ad idem that the interest of justice would be
43 WP No.11836.2015
-2-
served if the petition is disposed of by continuing the ad-interim
order directing the parties to maintain status quo till the disposal of
the suit.
4. In view of the above, the parties shall maintain status
quo in respect of the specific portion of the property indicated to be
sold to the plaintiff in the sale deed which shall remain in operation
till the final disposal of the suit.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated
upon the merits of the case. All the contentions of the litigating
parties are kept open.
6. Considering that the suit is of the year 2014, the Trial
Court is requested to make an endeavour to expedite the
proceedings and decide the suit on its merits in accordance with
law, within a period of one year from today.
7. With the aforesaid observations, the Writ Petition
stands disposed of.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
Omkar Joshi
Checking your session…