Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Alkem Laboratories LimitedversusCommissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Raigad

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The petition is allowed to be withdrawn.

Summary

Alkem Laboratories Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Raigad. The petitioner, through counsel, later moved the court seeking leave to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request for withdrawal. The judges allowed the petition to be withdrawn and ordered the matter disposed. No substantive merits of the original dispute were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition may be withdrawn at the petitioner's request

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • CGST
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                86-wp 11838-26.doc

ARJUN
MACHHINDRA                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KADAM                                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by
ARJUN                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 11838 OF 2026
MACHHINDRA
KADAM
Date: 2026.10.06
17:56:17 +0530
                      Alkem Laboratories Ltd.                                   … Petitioner
                             Versus
                      Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Raigad           ... Respondents
                      & Anr.

                                           __________________________

                      Mr. Vinit V. Raje i/b Alaksha Legal for the Petitioner.
                                            __________________________

                                                    CORAM       : M. S. KARNIK AND
                                                                  SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
                                                    DATED       : 6th OCTOBER, 2026.

                      P.C. :

                      1.           On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks

                      leave to withdraw the petition.

                      2.           Allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.



                           (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                        (M. S. KARNIK, J.)




                       Amk                                                                1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.