Bombay High Court
SMT. MOHANA MADHAV SATHEversusMR. TAUFIQUE HAROON LAKHANI DECD THRU LHRS AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Swapnil Mohana Madhav Sathe filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel had been discharged by an order dated 6 October 2023, and no new advocate appeared for the petitioner. The Court gave a final opportunity to the petitioner to appear on 16 September 2026. The petitioner failed to appear despite the notice. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear before the Court
Subjects
- writ petition
- non-prosecution
- failure to appear
- civil procedure
- disposal of petition
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:37783
13-WP-11853-2019.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11853 OF 2019
Swapnil
Mohana Madhav Sathe …Petitioner
Vs.
Taufique Haroon Lakhani
Decd Thru Lhrs and Anr. …Respondents
None for the petitioner.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 16th SEPTEMBER 2026
ORDER :
1. On 29th August 2026, following order was passed :
“ 1. Learned counsel who was earlier appearing for the
petitioner submits that by order dated 6 th October 2023, the
advocate is already granted discharge. The copy of the order
is placed on record. No other advocate appears for the
petitioner today.
2. As a last chance to the petitioner, stand over to 16 th
September 2026.”
2. Even today none appears for the petitioner.
1/2
13-WP-11853-2019.docx
3. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
2/2
Checking your session…