Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MAHARASHTRA RAJYA GRAMSEVAK UNION THROUGH ITS DISTRICT PRESIDENT ASHOK CHANDRABHAN BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The Maharashtra Rajya Gramsevak Union filed Writ Petition No.11857 of 2022 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. After extensive arguments, the Court indicated it was not inclined to grant the relief sought. The petitioner, through its counsel, gave written instructions to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were adjudicated, and no statutes or precedents were cited.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court should grant the relief sought in the writ petition
  • Whether a petition can be withdrawn after the Court has expressed its inclination not to grant relief

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • relief
  • Maharashtra Rajya Gramsevak Union
  • State of Maharashtra

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42987-DB
                                                                        902.WP.11857.2022.doc



                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 11857 OF 2022

          Maharashtra Rajya Gramsevak Union
          Through Its District President
          Ashok Chandrabhan Bhosale                                  ...Petitioner

                   Versus

          The State of Maharashtra and Others                  ...Respondents
                                           ***
           Mr. Bolkar Yogesh B., Advocate for the Petitioner.
           Mr. M. K. Goyanka, Addl.GP for the Respondent – State.
                                           ***
                                     CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                            DATE      : 16th SEPTEMBER 2026.
          PER COURT :

          1.                 This matter was argued at length and then this Court was

          not inclined to grant relief, learned advocate for the petitioner sought

          time to take instructions from the petitioner.

          2.                 The petitioner – union has given written instructions to the

          learned advocate for the petitioner that since this Court is not inclined

          to grant relief, the union has taken a decision to withdraw the writ

          petition.

          3.                 Writ petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.




               ( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. )                 ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. )

          Shrikant Malani                                                         Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.